Skip to main content

Chitter chatter and innuendo - how judges' gossip shapes gymnastics


I was browsing my Facebook yesterday, looking for some news of women's podium training, when I came across the above entry on International Gymnast's Facebook page.  It has provoked a significant response, with over 30 comments, including one from Aimee Boorman, coach to World Champion Simone Biles.

Only a few years ago, details of podium training, judges' meetings and so on were inaudible to the fan's ear.  Without accreditation, a fan had to travel to World Championships and network, network, network to find the most reliable source of information.  Mostly, there was the odd snippet to add colour to your picture of Worlds, if you were lucky.  A few months later your print copy of IG would drop through your letterbox, and you would read between the lines, eager for the slightest hint of behind the scenes tittle tattle.  But generally, judges' chatter was reserved for those privileged enough to be attached to a delegation, or to have media accreditation for Worlds.

Social media has changed all of that.  The curtain between the fan's view and what happens in training, qualifications and beyond is becoming gradually more and more transparent.  In America, USA Gymnastics has provided live streaming of some of podium training and most of qualifications, and soon enough we will all be able to see everything that happens in this early stage of competitions, and not a moment too soon as, like Christmas Eve, podium training is often more exciting than the main event.

Yet, not content with live streaming, we all want to hear what the judges and coaches and gymnasts are saying and we all comb the internet for the merest scrap.  Which is what makes IG's innocent little comment so intriguing, and I was a little bit surprised to see somebody from USA Gymnastics react so freely to it on a public forum.  The behaviour described is, after all, accepted practice and, presumably, ethical.  Why would Aimee be so sensitive to it?  We have to take into account the context, in which many pro-American bloggers are sounding off about the fabled improvements the American team - the weakest we have seen in many years - has made on uneven bars.  Better marks here might prove vital in a close final if margins on other apparatus, for example floor, are diminished.  Clearly, there is a lobbying strategy going on, to maximise the possible score the US can achieve on bars, no everywhere, and this isn't just about how the girls perform on the apparatus.  All the same, I don't believe that anything was going on that fell outside the boundaries of usual podium training behaviour. 

At this moment, I am reminded of the 1991 World Championships and the much disputed resulted of the women's all around final.  The competition, based in Indianapolis, USA, saw America's Kim Zmeskal win gold and become her country's first ever all around champion.  It was controversial because her main rival for the title, Svetlana Boguinskaia, had gone through her routines faultlessly and with unmatched artistry.  In a small way, the competition was a microcosm of things to come in the sport of gymnastics.  An energetic bundle of power, Zmeskal had impressed the judges - and the American public - with accurate acrobatics and youthful enthusiasm.  For once, the grace and elegance of gymnastics was forgotten, the line and weightlessness of artistic gymnastics was sacrificed at the altar of acrobatic skill.

It was devastating, incomprehensible - how could the judges have made such a basic error?  Only corrupt judging could possibly have created such a result, I mumbled.  But no - a conversation with a British gymnastics coach put me right on this.  No need for bribes, he said.  Of course judges, coaches, gymnasts talk to each other, and of course the subject of gymnastics, and marks, does come up.  But it's relatively rare for money to actually change hands - in fact it's not really necessary.  Judges, coaches, delegation heads, all know the relative strengths and weaknesses of both individual gymnasts and teams.  All that's necessary (if you want to skew the marks) is to talk about particular characteristics in gymnasts' work and gently nudge the conversation towards the idea that deductions should be taken for particular types of fault, or bonuses given for particular skills or characteristics. 

You might have to be a bit gullible to take this kind of direction from an isolated contact, but people can be really easy to convince of anything if enough people say it at once.  So on a gymnastics level, for example, if you had a really large delegation at a World Championships, and you were all well coordinated, promoting the right message, you could create quite a buzz about anything that pleased you, really.  At the 1989 World Championships, for example, there had been quite a furore when West Germany's Andreas Aguilar had beaten East Germany's Andreas Wecker on rings.  Eventually, poor Aguilar gifted his gold medal to Wecker, so convinced was he and the rest of the world that the outcome of the competition had been unjust.  But how on earth had such a result been possible?  Well, perhaps it came out of a judges' meeting, over a drink in a delegation's hotel, a casual conversation in which opportunities for deduction and bonus were suggested that were detrimental to one gymnast and favourable to the other. 

Karl-Heinz Zschocke, Ellen Berger, and Yuri Titov - judges and officials

Of course, the Codes of Points have changed since the late 1980s.  Execution deductions are much more specific than they were in the qualitatively ruled era of artistry and innovation, but in many ways today's more specific judging method is one that is more open to manipulation.  It can be imagined that this kind of lobbying very much shapes the sport, in fact.  How else would deductions be agreed amongst the various technical committees, and where do the ideas for changes come from if it is not through the channel of interaction with fellow sporting professionals.  That may be one of the reasons why Andrei Rodionenko, for example, has highlighted how important it is that his coaching staff learn to speak English.  I would moot that this is not only so that they can understand the Code (the translated versions are often at odds with the primary English language edition), but also so that they can discuss the merits of gymnastics with judges and other coaches, make a fair argument for their gymnasts and have a fair chance of completing the rather tricky appeals documentation.  In this, of course, it is essential to have a knowledge of one's rivals, which is, no doubt, why the American judges, assigned to floor and vault, were taking such an interest in the Chinese bars.

Maria Simionescu - a leading judge of the 1980s and 1990s
Sometimes, judges' gossip takes over and we have to witness bitter feuding between judges, coaches, and other officials.  Those of you who are old enough to remember the 1980 Olympics will recall how a dispute between East Germany's Ellen Berger (then Head of the WTC) and Romania's Maria Simionescu (Head Judge on beam), halted the women's all round competition for around half an hour, keeping the cameras glued to the gymnastics arena for once.  The argument revolved around the score given to Romania's Nadia Comaneci for her beam routine, that ultimately led to the crowning of the Soviet Union's Elena Davydova as all around champion. Only two years previously Simionescu's Romanian team had walked out of the event finals at the 1978 Prague European Championships over a similar dispute on vault.

And, of course, we have the never to be forgotten interview with Nelli Kim, head of the WTC, in which she panned the Russian system; quite unprecedented behaviour for a sporting official in such an influential position, and really quite unacceptable.  Nevertheless, part of the tapestry of gymnastics life, the gossip and innuendo that contributes to the ever changing picture of our sport and that is ever more in the spotlight now that social media has opened the curtains to this world. 

Gymnastics is constantly in motion.  Much earlier in this blog, I have written about the battle between artistry and acrobatics that has taken place.  While this remains of interest to me, the battle is almost over; acrobatics have won for the time being, until the next big change comes along.  And this change will be effected not only by the gymnasts' performance, but also, in large part, by the gossip and chatter that goes on in competitions.  International Gymnast's Facebook post was significant in ways that reach well beyond the mere scandal-mongering of a few fans.  It reveals how important power and influence are to the sport - this is a fact of life.

Comments

  1. Spot on ... I noticed that the "pro american bloggers" trying to sell the american mediocracy on Bars and describe it as a "setting show" like they described Kocian's podium training routine when she failed to keep her legs tight the whole routine not to mention other mistakes ...
    I think that there is trend among the "pro american judges" to diminish the gap between the american mediocracy and the unparalleled russian technique on UB (if a russian gymnasts missed a handstand penalized heavily and if it has done by american gymnasts they turn a blind eye)
    I believe that politics nowadays is playing a significant role in sport generally and gymnastics specifically, and I think FIG should change the E-score to be P-score (P stands for political) ...
    John

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have yet to read any blogs that say the Americans have improved so drastically on bars that they will challenge China or Russia. The consensus seems to be "improvement." Might the usa get a gymnast or two into finals? Probably, will that gymnast win? Probably not if everyone hits.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are correct that people have only spoken of their improvements. No one has said USA is challenging for gold on bars. At most, I've seen some people say Ashton Locklear has an outside chance for bronze if people mess up, but that's about it. That person, like this blog, just hates US gymnasts and is bashing.

      Delete
    2. Anon, where have I said that I hate American gymnasts? Where have I 'bashed' them?

      Please don't try to wind people up with your emotional language ... You don't have to read this blog if you don't like it. See the title bar and 'About this blog' if you are unsure of the subject.

      I also recommend that you read posts carefully before you respond. Only polite, on topic, well written comments are published. Yours is borderline abusive - similar posts will not be published. Read the Community Guidelines for advice.

      Delete
  3. Why are you surprised Aimee had a reaction when IG was clearly trying to spread gossip about how the Americans are supposedly cheating and if they win that is the reason. IG repeatedly made little comments implying such and people over social media picked up on it. I would want to defend myself too if someone was accusing me of cheating when it was not true.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No one is accusing anyone if cheating; in fact my post seeks to explain the context in which IG's observation was made.
      I do not see why Aimee needs to be so defensive when what was happening is common practice, merely part of the tapestry of everyday sporting politics. But there is no criticism of either IG or of Aimee - just an attempt to explain and set the wider scene.

      Delete
  4. Have all of the comments prior to 10-4 been removed?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All of the off topic material has been removed.

      Delete
  5. The funny thing about American fans complaining over this article is that they used to say the same about the Soviets. They were the best and there is no way to deny that, but when they started to get good competition from the Romanians and later from the Americans (Gutsu vs Miller) people started to say the very same thing or perhaps even worse since they have actually made accusations from bribery to drugs. I think right now is hard to see because the Americans have a huge advantage on floor and vault and of course, people are going to say they have the highest difficulty and they have won fair and square (nobody is denying this) but if things were to change and they actually get some competition it be interesting to see how this plays out. I think it already has happen with Komova vs Wieber back in 2011 and of course Komova vs Douglas which is always overlook because of Komova's mistake on vault even thought the reference panel questioned this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Chinese must have been really good at that to get Zou Kai gold on high bar in 2008.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Typical American mantra, when they fail to convince they resort to Label with words like haters, racist just to intimidate/bully you and prevent you speaking your mind, but in fact such words reflect their bigotry …
    So if this blog is all about hating American gymnasts, why are you bothering yourself to come by?
    John

    ReplyDelete
  8. I am neither pro-US or pro-Russian (or any other delegation) because I think all of the top teams have their strengths and weaknesses. There is no gymnast more beautiful to me than Aliya Mustafina, who has both power and elegance. But, on the other hand, I absolutely love watching Simone Biles' explosive sets. Sui Lu was one of my most favorite beam workers and Iordache remains a gymnast that I constantly root for because I just want her to win a damn medal already. Her talent is enormous and her gymnastics brilliant! So, my point is that I am not at all partial to any one team and in fact I would love to see a team seriously challenge the US like in the old days.

    However, all of that aside, I think that IG's post was provocative and also incredibly unprofessional. I love this blog. It is one of my go-to blogs, but I absolutely agree with Aimee Boorman on her response and I disagree that it was defensive. I do not think it is possible to truly classify what IG posted as innocuous. It is particularly the last part, that the judges were moving to events they weren't assigned to, as if this was abnormal, that was the troublesome part. It was a snarky post and I am glad Aimee spoke up. The reason Aimee is so "defensive" is because IG, while not coming out and saying so, was inferring that this was not commonplace and that there was some scandal brewing. Aimee was setting the record straight and I commend her for doing so, just as I would commend any other delegation's coach for doing the same if IG had written that about their judges.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

USSR is a mighty sports power!

Once upon a time sportsmen were heros and role models, a shining moral example for all of society as to the values of a strong work ethic and a healthy body. USSR is a might sports power!  B. Reshetnikov, 1962  Picture courtesy of A Soviet Poster a Day I love these Soviet era posters and the way they capture the spirit of the time, something special about the purity of the collective sporting effort.  Of course today, sport is about different things.  The political and behavioural symbolic value of sport has been replaced by sport as a commodity.  Sports stars exist as brand heroes in our shopping centres and glossy magazines, the sometimes lurid details of their everyday lives trumpeted on the pages of such magazines as Hello! and the gossip pages of the internet. Compare photographs of Olympians Svetlana Khorkina (1996, 2000 and 2004) and Ludmilla Tourischeva (1972, 1976): Khorkina is in all her glamour shot, sexually charged splendour; Svetlana Khorkina, undated Tou

UPDATE 23/9 - Russian WAG team for Nanning confirmed

Daria Spiridonova will compete at her first World Championships this autumn.  Picture : RGF Natalia Kalugina has confirmed the Russian team for Nanning : Aliya Mustafina, Maria Kharenkova, Tatiana Nabieva,Ekaterina Kramarenko, Alla Sosnitskaya, Daria Spiridonova.  Reserve : Polina Fyodorova Here is a paraphrased translation of a comment by Natalia Kalugina on her Facebook page : 'Aliya has confidence in competition and she is, kind of, a coach to this team.  In Europe she succeeded in this role and she has told the coaches that she even liked it. The main fighting force will be Kharenkova, Sosnitskaya and Spiridonova.  Accordingly, the strongest apparatus will be beam (Marina Bulashenko With God!).  The Chinese women, of course, have been known to win that apparatus, but if one falls, they all fall.   Alla Sosnitskaya could compete in the vault final, and - in theory - on the floor. On bars, of course, Russia will probably lose to the Chinese women, but they should be able to hold

Russian Nationals 2024 : Part 2 WAG Team Finals and Individual Qualifiers

Injury was a main concern for the Russian women at this competition.  Of the Olympians, only Gerasimova competed at full strength.  Both Listunova and Melnikova were suffering with pain; you could see this on their faces and in their movement, by the end of the day's competition.  For Listunova, foot and back pain were problems, while Melnikova had severe achilles pain.  Melnikova is booked in for an MRI as soon as she returns to Moscow after a short break in Sochi, where she is staying with David Belyavski and his family.   Slava Urazova didn't make the competition at all after injuring her knee in training.  Ilyankova has retired.  Both Diana Kustova and Alena Glotova are still recovering from chest infections and Kustova did not compete at all.  Up and coming gymnasts worth watching include Lyudmilla Roschina, Leila Vasileeva (a favourite of mine) and Maria Agafanova.  The standard of execution was generally good, although there were lots of mistakes, especially on beam.  On

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more